The Monitor hypothesis implies that formal rules, or conscious learning, play only a limited role in second language performance.Īs we know, we have two distinct ways to develop a second language. This can happen before we speak or write, or after (self-correction).

Learning comes into play only to make changes in the form of our utterance, after is has been “produced” by the acquired system. Learning has only one function, and that is as a Monitor, or editor. Normally, acquisition “initiates” our utterances in a second language and is responsible for our fluency. The Monitor hypothesis posits that acquisition and learning are used in very specific ways. But first, we have to know what it is the purpose of this hypothesis. This article has as purpose talk about The monitor hypothesis and how it works. These hypotheses are The input hypothesis, The acquisition-learning hypothesis, The monitor hypothesis, The natural order hypothesis, and The affective filter hypothesis.

Between the decades of the 70s and 80s, the linguist Stephen Krashen was developing his studies of five hypothesis of his theory of Second Language Acquisition.

Process monitor filter or